Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 10:12
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Draisaitl says Perry rallied Oilers: 'When he speaks up, you listen' - theScore.com
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Meta held talks to buy Thinking Machines, Perplexity, and Safe Superintelligence - The Verge
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
How airline fees have turned baggage into billions - BBC
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Why do I sweat so much after applying moisture or sun screen on my face? I have normal skin.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
BlackRock removed from Texas blacklist after climate policy rollback - Financial Times
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Who Will Replace Anna Wintour at ‘Vogue’? - The Cut
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.